<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KimPriestap &#187; Camille Paglia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politics.upnorthmommy.com/tag/camille-paglia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politics.upnorthmommy.com</link>
	<description>No-nonsense conservative opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:43:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>In which I speak highly of a liberal</title>
		<link>http://politics.upnorthmommy.com/2009/01/in-which-i-speak-highly-of-a-liberal/</link>
		<comments>http://politics.upnorthmommy.com/2009/01/in-which-i-speak-highly-of-a-liberal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Priestap</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camille Paglia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cavett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberlism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.upnorthmommy.com/?p=954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really like Camille Paglia. She&#8217;s liberal yet she&#8217;s very smart, two things that don&#8217;t normally go together. On top of that, she&#8217;s honest. What I mean is that she will give her honest opinion instead of the daily liberal talking points.  Take, for example, her answer to a question from one of her readers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like Camille Paglia. She&#8217;s liberal yet she&#8217;s very smart, two things that don&#8217;t normally go together. On top of that, she&#8217;s honest. What I mean is that she will give her honest opinion instead of the daily liberal talking points.  Take, for example, <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/paglia/2009/01/14/obama/">her answer to a question</a> from one of her readers about Dick Cavett&#8217;s and the media&#8217;s treatment of Sarah Palin:</p>
<blockquote><p>As I have repeatedly said in this column, I have never had the slightest problem in understanding Sarah Palin&#8217;s meaning at any time. On the contrary, I have positively enjoyed her fresh, natural, rapid delivery with its syncopated stops and slides &#8212; a fabulous example of which was the way (in her recent <a href="http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=254953" target="_blank">interview with John Ziegler</a>) that she used a soft, swooping satiric undertone to zing Katie Couric&#8217;s dippy narcissism and to assert her own outrage as a &#8220;mama grizzly&#8221; at libels against her family.</p>
<p>Ideology-driven attacks on Palin became clotted liberal clichés within 24 hours of her introduction as John McCain&#8217;s running mate. What a bunch of tittering lemmings the urban elite have become in this country. From Couric&#8217;s vicious manipulations of video clips to Cavett&#8217;s bourgeois platitudes, the preemptive strike on Palin as a potential presidential candidate has grossly misfired. Whatever legitimate objections may be raised to Palin on political grounds (explored, for example, by David Talbot in Salon) have been lost in the amoral overkill that has defamed a self-made woman of concrete achievement in the public realm.</p>
<p>And let me take this opportunity to say that of all the innumerable print and broadcast journalists who have interviewed me in the U.S. and abroad since I arrived on the scene nearly 20 years ago, Katie Couric was definitively the stupidest. As a guest on NBC&#8217;s &#8220;Today&#8221; show during my 1992 book tour, I was astounded by Couric&#8217;s small, humorless, agenda-ridden mind, still registered in that pinched, tinny monotone that makes me rush across the room to change stations whenever her banal mini-editorials blare out at 5 p.m. on the CBS radio network. And of course I would never spoil my dinner by tuning into Couric&#8217;s TV evening news show. That sallow, wizened, drum-tight, cosmetic mummification look is not an appetite enhancer outside of Manhattan or L.A. There&#8217;s many a moose in Alaska with greater charm and pizazz.</p></blockquote>
<p>I will admit one of the reasons I quoted this part of her answer is because of her take on Katie Couric. I chuckled, and after only 1 cup of coffee  that&#8217;s an achievement, when I read that paragraph because her opinion is in line with my opinion of Katie.  That Camille has the same opinion confirms to me that my feelings were honest and objective and not a reaction simply based upon my conservative view of things.</p>
<p>My primary reason for quoting her, though, was her take on Sarah Palin. Her opinion here is an opinion she&#8217;s held for some time and I&#8217;m thankful there is still a liberal out there who is willing to be honest about the Governor. It&#8217;s obvious Camille, unlike so many in the liberal establishment, is not intimidated by her. But, then again, I don&#8217;t think Camille is intimidated by anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politics.upnorthmommy.com/2009/01/in-which-i-speak-highly-of-a-liberal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: politics.upnorthmommy.com @ 2010-07-30 09:58:57 -->